Make contributions comparable
Assign separate questions or sources so contributors do not unknowingly repeat the same investigation. Ask each one to state what it checked, what it found, and where the evidence came from. A short, consistent handoff lets the coordinator compare results without mistaking a confident tone for stronger evidence.
When two agents cover related topics, define their boundaries and identify the shared terms they should use. This is especially useful when one gathers product behavior and another checks an edge case. Keep the main question and expected final audience visible so local findings remain relevant.
Resolve disagreement before publishing
Treat conflicting results as a signal to inspect the underlying evidence. Check whether the contributors used different dates, assumptions, or definitions, then verify the disputed point against the most direct source available. If uncertainty remains, explain the limit instead of combining incompatible conclusions.
The coordinating agent owns the final synthesis. Remove duplicated context, cite the evidence that supports each material statement, and preserve caveats that change the reader's decision. A final pass should check that every important claim has a source and that no contributor's suggestion became a fact without review.